Hi Dave Page,
>> I already started working with wxCheckListBox.
>> But, then realized, we may need to disable some parameters for particular
>> version of the Postgresql. I couldn't find anything like this in the
>> documents. :(
>> We may need to inherit that control and our own dray feature. I don't think,
>> it is
>> worth put that much efforts.
>> What do you say?
> No, I don't think it is worth it at the moment. You could put the
> checkboxes in a 2 x 2 grid and see if that looks OK. If not, just
> shrink the comment box a little. I don't think we're at crisis point
> yet, and when we do get there we can always split the properties
> across 2 pages (I think we already do that for one object type - I
> forget which atm).
I just sent the patch and currently used this logic only. :)
EnterpriseDB INDIA: http://www.enterprisedb.com
In response to
pgadmin-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Dave Page||Date: 2009-01-12 09:05:41|
|Subject: Re: SVN Commit by dpage: r7544 - in trunk/pgadmin3: . pgadmin/frm pgadmin/include/utils pgadmin/ui|
|Previous:||From: Ashesh Vashi||Date: 2009-01-12 08:56:08|
|Subject: PATCH: Window Function support for PostgreSQL 8.4|