From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add support for matching wildcard server certificates to the new |
Date: | 2008-12-01 15:31:46 |
Message-ID: | 49340362.20704@hagander.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Magnus Hagander wrote:
> I think I agree with the idea that we should match wildcards only at the
> beginning of the name *for now*, and then see what people actually
> request :-) I'm less sure about the single-pathname-component part, but
> the argument around backwards compatible is certainly a very valid one..
Here's one that (I think) does that. For every step, the code becomes
simpler - which I like when it comes to security code :)
//Magnus
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
wildcard_again.diff | text/x-diff | 2.8 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2008-12-01 15:34:46 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add support for matching wildcard server certificates to the new |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2008-12-01 15:05:50 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add support for matching wildcard server certificates to the new |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2008-12-01 15:31:51 | Re: Statement-level triggers and inheritance |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2008-12-01 15:26:07 | Re: New to_timestamp implementation is pretty strict |