Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add support for matching wildcard server certificates to the new

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add support for matching wildcard server certificates to the new
Date: 2008-12-01 15:31:46
Message-ID: 49340362.20704@hagander.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

Magnus Hagander wrote:
> I think I agree with the idea that we should match wildcards only at the
> beginning of the name *for now*, and then see what people actually
> request :-) I'm less sure about the single-pathname-component part, but
> the argument around backwards compatible is certainly a very valid one..

Here's one that (I think) does that. For every step, the code becomes
simpler - which I like when it comes to security code :)

//Magnus

Attachment Content-Type Size
wildcard_again.diff text/x-diff 2.8 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2008-12-01 15:34:46 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add support for matching wildcard server certificates to the new
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2008-12-01 15:05:50 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add support for matching wildcard server certificates to the new

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2008-12-01 15:31:51 Re: Statement-level triggers and inheritance
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2008-12-01 15:26:07 Re: New to_timestamp implementation is pretty strict