From: | Elvis Henríquez <henriquez(dot)elvis(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Case studies |
Date: | 2007-11-28 02:32:01 |
Message-ID: | 493343bd0711271832l7ddf96cx57a91bd082717a28@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
That's what I'm telling to them, but they want proven results in other
companies, but I'll manage it.
Thanks for your reply and information.
Best regards.
On Nov 27, 2007 2:12 AM, Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> That's actually pretty small. Where I work we have a data warehouse
> of similar design (a few large tables, a few small lookup tables). It
> has 86,840,447 rows and takes up 44 Gigs of space. It sits on a
> single CPU box with a 4 disk RAID-10 and runs queries covering a few
> minutes to a few days worth of monitoring data. Sequential scanning
> the whole main table takes 621 seconds or so (10+ minutes). We add
> 150 to 200k rows a day to it.
>
> Selecting a days's worth of data takes ~ 350ms. A week's worth takes
> 2 to 10 seconds depending on how much is cached.
>
> This is a small database for either oracle or postgresql. Talk your
> bosses into giving postgresql a try if you can. You should be able to
> build a 20million test database in an afternoon or so, so it's not
> like you'll be dedicating thousands of man hours to test it.
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gregory Williamson | 2007-11-28 10:32:21 | Re: Case studies |
Previous Message | Elvis Henríquez | 2007-11-28 02:28:59 | Re: Case studies |