Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements

From: Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements
Date: 2008-07-07 13:58:17
Message-ID: 487220F9.4010403@sigaev.ru (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
> I looked this over and it looks good in general.  I was only wondering
> about for single-column indexes -- we're storing attribute numbers too,
> right?
No, GinState->oneCol field signals to GinFormTuple and 
gin_index_getattr/gintuple_get_attrnum about actual storage.

Single column index is binary compatible with current index :)

-- 
Teodor Sigaev                                   E-mail: teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru
                                                    WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2008-07-07 14:03:40
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements
Previous:From: Bernd HelmleDate: 2008-07-07 13:46:38
Subject: Schema-qualified statements in pg_dump output

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2008-07-07 14:03:40
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2008-07-07 13:45:33
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group