Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: BUG #4267: initdb fails

From: Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: Vadim Karacharsky <sw(at)mail(dot)ru>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #4267: initdb fails
Date: 2008-06-28 13:12:15
Message-ID: 486638AF.1010402@postnewspapers.com.au (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs
Dave Page wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 6:26 PM, Craig Ringer
> <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au> wrote:
> 
>> Alas, Process Explorer doesn't seem to work on Vista. MS think that Process
>> monitor is a replacement, but it lacks all the handy detailed process
>> introspection, thread control, etc that Process Explorer has.
>>
>> Frustrating.
> 
> Eh? Process Monitor certainly works on Vista (although I haven't used
> it on SP1 yet). I used it extensively when trying to figure out a
> rather nasty bug issue in our privilege-shedding code a while back.

Interesting. I've always had system stability problems after launching 
either it or filemon. I'm about to configure a clean Vista install (post 
hard disk failure) so I'll have to re-test. Perhaps there was a hook DLL 
or similar nastyness interfering.

--
Craig Ringer

In response to

Responses

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Craig RingerDate: 2008-06-28 13:16:40
Subject: Re: BUG #4267: initdb fails
Previous:From: Dave PageDate: 2008-06-28 12:56:00
Subject: Re: BUG #4267: initdb fails

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group