Simon Riggs wrote:
> I've extended the patch without introducing another new status variable,
> which was my original concern with what you suggested previously.
Ok, that'll work. Committed, thanks. I changed the sanity check that
xlogfname > restore point into an Assert, though, because that's a sign
that something's wrong.
I noted that there's no reason why the truncation point calculation had
to be moved outside the case-statement, but it does look better that way
so I did apply that change.
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Heikki Linnakangas||Date: 2008-05-09 14:37:12|
|Subject: Re: Verified fix for Bug 4137|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2008-05-09 14:23:12|
|Subject: Re: [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches |