Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches
Date: 2008-05-01 02:11:34
Message-ID: 481926D6.6030209@commandprompt.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Josh Berkus wrote:
> Folks,

> So it would be much better to have this functionality be "mainstream" 
> rather than a fork.  If it does get bounced, please do it becuase of code 
> quality and not because "nobody is asking for this".  

+1

Joshua D. Drake

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Andrej Ricnik-BayDate: 2008-05-01 02:16:31
Subject: Re: [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches
Previous:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2008-05-01 01:01:58
Subject: Re: [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Andrej Ricnik-BayDate: 2008-05-01 02:16:31
Subject: Re: [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches
Previous:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2008-05-01 01:01:58
Subject: Re: [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group