Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: we don't have a bugzilla

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: we don't have a bugzilla
Date: 2008-04-28 17:08:41
Message-ID: 48160499.5010004@dunslane.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Chris Browne wrote:
> andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net (Andrew Dunstan) writes:
>   
>> Raphaël Jacquot wrote:
>>     
>>> would seem like a good idea, no ?
>>>
>>> http://www.murrayc.com/blog/permalink/2008/04/25/postgresql-has-no-bugzilla/
>>>       
>> Before you come trolling on this (or any other) subject, please read
>> the voluminous debates that have taken place about it. Apparently you
>> think it's something we have never considered, which in light of the
>> product we maintain would be more than remarkable.
>>
>> Having done that, please endeavour to make an actual contribution to
>> the discussion.
>>     
>
> This seems more than a tad unfair.
>
>
>   

I'm sorry, open season to beat me up on this closed yesterday. :-)

cheers

andrew

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Martijn van OosterhoutDate: 2008-04-28 18:10:17
Subject: Re: we don't have a bugzilla
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-04-28 17:05:38
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Removing typename from A_Const (was: Empty arrays with ARRAY[])

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group