Re: Lessons from commit fest

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Lessons from commit fest
Date: 2008-04-19 00:05:52
Message-ID: 48093760.8010705@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Gregory Stark wrote:
> "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>
>
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>>> doxygen's 200-some is clearly an order of magnitude too low, but I
>>> wonder whether Bruce's list hasn't got some false hits ...
>>>
>
> Skimming the output it does have things like "int" and "float" but presumably
> we would know if that caused any problem, they wouldn't inflate the numbers
> much.
>
>
>> 2800 does seem a bit high. My buildfarm member dungbeetle just found 2482 on a
>> build that is only missing the optional pam, bonjour and gssapi config options.
>>
>
> The numbers going to vary heavily from OS to OS so it seems to me that these
> are a basically the same order of magnitude.
>

It looks like Windows will blow all our existing numbers out of the
water. Here's a list generated from Cygwin with 6088 symbols. I'm
working on getting a similar list from MinGW.

http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_stage_log.pl?nm=brown_bat&dt=2008-04-18%20230054&stg=typedefs

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-04-19 00:19:49 Re: Lessons from commit fest
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2008-04-18 21:35:04 Re: Testing pg_terminate_backend()