From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [pgsql-www] New email list for emergency communications |
Date: | 2008-03-25 16:47:59 |
Message-ID: | 47E92CBF.1000107@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> writes:
>
>> On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 06:39:25PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>
>>> perusing a mailbox again. We have unfortunately been badly underprepared
>>> for this.
>>>
>
>
>> Surely that there is an emerging consensus to that effect means that it's
>> not as unfortunate as it might be? I seem to recall the original
>> announcement suggesting this was an experiment. I wouldn't expect the first
>> couple rounds to go without a hitch; as long as there is procedural
>> improvement the next time, that's a good thing, right?
>>
>
> Yeah, we expected to have glitches. I think we now have a much better
> idea what sort of status-tracking support we need for future fests.
>
>
>
Yes. I'm not meaning to whine, sorry if it comes over like that. It
looks to me like we need a sort of prep phase for a commit-fest, so the
people switching into commit-fest mode when it starts can do so with
little friction.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gregory Stark | 2008-03-25 16:49:25 | Re: partial dump of patch queue to wiki |
Previous Message | Gregory Stark | 2008-03-25 16:45:45 | Re: TRUNCATE TABLE with IDENTITY |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gregory Stark | 2008-03-25 16:49:25 | Re: partial dump of patch queue to wiki |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-03-25 16:23:46 | partial dump of patch queue to wiki |