Magnus Hagander wrote:
> As long as these things are covered, that's fine. But it'd be good if
> someone could verify it who actually knew about it. I think that means
> you, Marc :-) But if that's already done, then drop the point - it just
> wasn't clear from the original message.
And Marc has been in the loop the whole time (just fyi).
>>> Oh, and I also notice there has been zero commits about this to the
>>> autobackup repository, so obviously none of this is included in said
>>> backups - that also needs to be fixed.
Yeah... that has just been done.
Joshua D. Drake
In response to
pgsql-www by date
|Next:||From: Marc G. Fournier||Date: 2008-02-24 18:24:36|
|Subject: Re: archives.postgresql.org change|
|Previous:||From: Joshua D. Drake||Date: 2008-02-24 16:32:48|
|Subject: Re: Huh? What is this?|