Re: Small DB Server Advice

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Matthew <matthew(at)flymine(dot)org>
Cc: PGSQL Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Small DB Server Advice
Date: 2008-02-13 14:32:08
Message-ID: 47B2FF68.90208@hagander.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Matthew wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
>> 4 x 147GB 15000 rpm SCSI in RAID 10 with 320-1 RAID CARD + 64MB
>> cache BBU
>> 2x Intel Xeon E5405 / 4x 2.00GHz / 1333MHz FSB / 12MB cache
>> 6GB RAM
>>
>> Cost around 2320 GBP -- it would be great to get it under 2000
>> Needs to be in the UK.
>
>> I would be grateful for any comments. I'm particularly out of date about
>> the best processors to go for. DNUK also have Opteron as an option.
>
> That sounds pretty good. It should run postgres fairly well, especially
> if you have quite a few parallel queries coming in. You won't need a
> bigger BBU cache if it's read-heavy. You'll have eight CPU cores, which
> is good. And RAID 10 is good.

In my experience, battery backed cache is always worth the money. Even
if you're mostly select, you will have some updates. And it'll also pick
up other write activity onthe system...

//Magnus

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matthew 2008-02-13 14:35:27 Re: Small DB Server Advice
Previous Message Linux Guru 2008-02-13 14:25:02 Creating and updating table using function parameter reference