Guillaume Smet wrote:
> Hi Russell,
> On Jan 28, 2008 7:27 AM, Russell Smith <mr-russ(at)pws(dot)com(dot)au> wrote:
>> Can somebody explain why it's important to load with
>> synchronized_scanning off?
>> do_sql_command(g_conn, "SET synchronized_scanning TO off");
> It's the start point of this patch. See this thread [
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-01/msg00987.php ]
> for more information
Sorry, total brain fade in interpreting the patch.
g_conn is our connection to the database, not the command we are dumping.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Gregory Stark||Date: 2008-01-28 09:57:23|
|Subject: Re: RFC: array_agg() per SQL:200n|
|Previous:||From: Magnus Hagander||Date: 2008-01-28 08:55:58|
|Subject: Re: SSL connections don't cope with server crash very well at all|
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Dean Rasheed||Date: 2008-01-28 09:21:50|
|Subject: Auto-explain patch|
|Previous:||From: Guillaume Smet||Date: 2008-01-28 06:55:16|
|Subject: Re: Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable|