A. Kretschmer wrote:
>> is it expected that the currval() changes its value between calls within
>> one statement ?
> Conclusion, don't call nextval() within a TRIGGER, and insert either
> nextval() for the column or omit this column.
I only note that i still want to discuss the titled problem or to be
given an exact pointer to documentation regarding the currval() behavior
in the described situation, that i had.
In response to
pgsql-sql by date
|Next:||From: Stuart Brooks||Date: 2008-01-22 08:05:04|
|Subject: TIMESTAMP comparison problem|
|Previous:||From: A. Kretschmer||Date: 2008-01-22 07:36:37|
|Subject: Re: currval() within one statement|