Re: Default Stats Revisited

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Default Stats Revisited
Date: 2004-03-12 04:09:11
Message-ID: 4752.1079064551@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Another idea is whether a foreign key column should get extra
> statistics?

In practice, both ends of an FK relationship have to be indexed,
so I don't see that we need any extra special case for that.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2004-03-12 04:27:05 Re: pgFoundry WAS: On pgweb project
Previous Message Marty Scholes 2004-03-12 03:38:12 Re: Performance and WAL on big inserts/updates