Re: Mail setup broken (still/again?)

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Mail setup broken (still/again?)
Date: 2007-10-16 17:01:26
Message-ID: 4714EE66.6020005@hagander.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
>
> --On Tuesday, October 16, 2007 18:46:28 +0200 Magnus Hagander
> <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>
>
>> Thanks for the quick fixes!
>
> Thanks for pointing them out, specially the 450 -> 550 change ... should reduce
> some of the repeat hits:
>
> 4902 <BritneysBoudreaux(at)postgresql(dot)org>:
> 933 <CarrolljeffreyTyler(at)postgresql(dot)org>:
> 876 <EvanoctagonBall(at)postgresql(dot)org>:
> 863 <ErikasegregatePhipps(at)postgresql(dot)org>:
> 848 <JeremiahanthraciteCurry(at)postgresql(dot)org>:
> 845 <JenniehabitualMeade(at)postgresql(dot)org>:
> 805 <KipmoliereRocha(at)postgresql(dot)org>:
> 801 <GwendolynsolonWeston(at)postgresql(dot)org>:
> 793 <AngeliqueshipwreckZapata(at)postgresql(dot)org>:
> 788 <OlliedaggerJuarez(at)postgresql(dot)org>:
>
> And that was just today :)

What? Several of those aliases *should* exist, no? ;-)

I wonder how the hell they come up with those... I mean, what's the
percentage that they exist at all. I can understand those that fake
bill@ and joe@ and such addresses, but this...

//Magnus

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2007-10-16 17:08:14 Re: Mail setup broken (still/again?)
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2007-10-16 17:00:05 Re: Mail setup broken (still/again?)