From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, decibel(at)decibel(dot)org, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Advocacy wiki |
Date: | 2007-07-25 08:34:03 |
Message-ID: | 46A70AFB.7050006@postgresql.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Dave Page wrote:
>
>> No, stuff for end users was specifically excluded from the wiki from the
>> outset - and that should remain the case. We don't want 'unofficial' docs
>> springing up all over the place - that's what techdocs is for.
>
> Doesn't that ring the bell that maybe techdocs is not as great as we
> think? If people are desperately looking at alternatives, that may mean
> something. What is it?
>
Afaik there are no outstanding bugs or feature requests with Techdocs -
however it does require moderation before docs are published. Perhaps
thats what people are trying to avoid?
Regards, Dave
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2007-07-25 09:08:32 | Re: Event coverage on website |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-07-25 08:29:36 | Re: Advocacy wiki |