Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Dave Page wrote:
>> No, stuff for end users was specifically excluded from the wiki from the
>> outset - and that should remain the case. We don't want 'unofficial' docs
>> springing up all over the place - that's what techdocs is for.
> Doesn't that ring the bell that maybe techdocs is not as great as we
> think? If people are desperately looking at alternatives, that may mean
> something. What is it?
Afaik there are no outstanding bugs or feature requests with Techdocs -
however it does require moderation before docs are published. Perhaps
thats what people are trying to avoid?
In response to
pgsql-www by date
|Next:||From: Magnus Hagander||Date: 2007-07-25 09:08:32|
|Subject: Re: Event coverage on website|
|Previous:||From: Alvaro Herrera||Date: 2007-07-25 08:29:36|
|Subject: Re: Advocacy wiki|