Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Feature thought: idle in transaction timeout

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Russell Smith <mr-russ(at)pws(dot)com(dot)au>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Feature thought: idle in transaction timeout
Date: 2007-04-03 02:05:50
Message-ID: 4611B67E.5090304@dunslane.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Added to TODO:
>
> 	* Add idle_timeout GUC so locks are not held for log periods of time
>
>   
>

ITYM long periods.


cheers


andrew

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2007-04-03 02:17:15
Subject: Re: Feature thought: idle in transaction timeout
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2007-04-03 02:01:44
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Arrays of Complex Types

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group