FAST PostgreSQL wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Mar 2007 04:28, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> I have added this to the developer's FAQ to clarify the situtation of
>> posting a patch:
>>
>>     <li>PostgreSQL is licensed under a BSD license.  By posting a patch
>>     to the public PostgreSQL mailling lists, you are giving the PostgreSQL
>>     Global Development Group the non-revokable right to distribute your
>>     patch under the BSD license.  If you use code that is available under
>>     some other license that is BSD compatible (eg. public domain), please
>>     note that in your email submission.</li>
>>
> 
> We are happy to do this for every patch we submit. We can add an explicit 
> statement which will put our contribution under the BSD license. This 
> statement will override the email signature and will be approved by the 
> appropriate person.
> 
> Rgds,
> Arul Shaji

I know that I can speak for the community when I say, Thanks to you and
Fujitsu for taking our concerns into consideration.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake




-- 

      === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
             http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/

In response to

• Re: [HACKERS] at 2007-03-02 00:19:43 from FAST PostgreSQL

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Andrew Dunstan	Date: 2007-03-01 00:27:48
	Subject: Re: Compilation errors
Previous:	From: Gregory Stark	Date: 2007-03-01 00:07:54
	Subject: Re: COMMIT NOWAIT Performance Option

pgsql-patches by date

Next:	From: Takayuki Tsunakawa	Date: 2007-03-01 00:45:53
	Subject: Re: Dead Space Map version 2
Previous:	From: Chris Marcellino	Date: 2007-02-28 18:28:50
	Subject: Re: POSIX Shared memory, revised, again