Re: Compilation errors

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Compilation errors
Date: 2007-02-28 22:13:59
Message-ID: 45E5FEA7.5030808@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I wrote:
>
>
> I guess we could conditionally add prototypes for those functions to
> all the .l files if you really want to move to 2.5.33. Kinda yucky,
> though.
>
>

Actually, we couldn't.The definition section from the .l file gets
included after these functions. So we'd need to include something in
gram.y before including scan.c.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2007-02-28 22:14:24 Re: Resumable vacuum proposal and design overview
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2007-02-28 22:02:17 Re: Compilation errors