Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Jav Database Performance

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Markus Schiltknecht <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch>
Cc: Walter Cruz <walter(dot)php(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Jav Database Performance
Date: 2007-02-26 16:39:04
Message-ID: (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
Markus Schiltknecht wrote:
> Hi,
> Walter Cruz wrote:
>> Have anyone seen this?
> Looks like a good, well documented benchmark. Was well worth the read.
> Probably even more if you're more into Java than I am.
> What's surprising me is, that PostgreSQL often was 'only marginally
> slower' compared to MySQL. First, I thought: wow, MySQL must have
> improved. But later on, I've read that they tested the MyISAM storage
> engine. Thus, I'm surprised that
>  a) they perform only marginally better, and
>  b) that the results are so close and similar.
> I can only conclude, that PostgreSQL does a very well job in keeping the
> costs of consistency very low. ;-)


We Rock!

Joshua D. Drake

> Regards
> Markus
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend


      === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project:
PostgreSQL Replication:

In response to

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2007-02-26 17:36:41
Subject: Re: successful booth at Fosdem (Brussels)
Previous:From: Andreas 'ads' ScherbaumDate: 2007-02-26 13:39:46
Subject: Re: successful booth at Fosdem (Brussels)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2015 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group