Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Heikki, did this code cleanup get included in your recent btree split
> fix?

No.

> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
>>> In that case, newitemleft would be false, right?
>>> I'm saying the piece marked with X> below is unreachable:
>> Oh, I see.  Hmm ... probably so, I think that chunk of code was just
>> copied and pasted from where it occurs within the loop.

-- 
   Heikki Linnakangas
   EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

• Re: Dead code in _bt_split? at 2007-02-03 23:58:14 from Bruce Momjian

Responses

• Re: Dead code in _bt_split? at 2007-02-05 16:25:36 from Bruce Momjian

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Simon Riggs	Date: 2007-02-04 09:38:47
	Subject: Re: Referential Integrity and SHARE locks
Previous:	From: Simon Riggs	Date: 2007-02-04 09:25:18
	Subject: Re: Remove log segment and log_id fields from pg_controldata

pgsql-patches by date

Next:	From: Pavel Stehule	Date: 2007-02-04 13:48:22
	Subject: Re: this patch correct upper and lower case for translated month's and
Previous:	From: Simon Riggs	Date: 2007-02-04 09:25:18
	Subject: Re: Remove log segment and log_id fields from pg_controldata