Re: ideas for auto-processing patches

From: Tino Wildenhain <tino(at)wildenhain(dot)de>
To: markwkm(at)gmail(dot)com
Cc: Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ideas for auto-processing patches
Date: 2007-01-05 07:14:07
Message-ID: 459DFABF.5010400@wildenhain.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

markwkm(at)gmail(dot)com schrieb:
> On 1/4/07, Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au> wrote:
>> On Thu, 4 Jan 2007, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
...
>> Pulling branches from
>> anonvcvs regularly might be burdensome bandwidth-wise. So, like you
>> say, a
>> local mirror would be beneficial for patch testing.
>
> Right some sort of local mirror would definitely speed things up.

Easier speedup in this regard would be using subversion instead
of cvs. It transfers only diffs to your working copy (or rather,
to your last checkout) so its really saving on bandwidth.

Regards
Tino

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2007-01-05 08:30:58 Re: Problem with windows installer
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2007-01-05 06:49:36 Re: Problem with windows installer