> On 1/4/07, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>> markwkm(at)gmail(dot)com wrote:
>> > On 1/4/07, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> >> On Thu, 2007-01-04 at 09:09 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> >> > That also happens. The only way I can see of ensuring it does not
>> >> happen
>> >> > would be to auto-process all patch submissions.
>> >> Sounds a good idea. Patch farm anyone? Auto apply/make check?
>> > I'm actually trying to simplify something I was working on at OSDL to
>> > do this. PLM at OSDL was a little to Linux focused. Will let
>> > everyone know when I have a working prototype.
>> Feel free to discuss design/functionality any time. For example, a
>> mechanism to feed patches to the buildfarm has previously been
>> suggested. If this could be done in some automated, controlled and
>> reasonably safe way it might be useful - it might afford reviewers a
>> "try before you buy" option. Also, hooking this up with the stuff that
>> Lukas Smith is doing might be good.
> I'll start another thread about what PLM is doing and what my initial
> ideas are. Do you have a pointer to what Lukas Smith is doing?
some of the stuff in here:
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Ron Mayer||Date: 2007-01-04 19:18:12|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] wal_checksum = on (default) | off|
|Previous:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2007-01-04 19:12:00|
|Subject: Re: ReadyForQuery()|