Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] server process (PID 1188) exited with exit code

From: Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>, JEAN-PIERRE PELLETIER <pelletier_32(at)sympatico(dot)ca>, List <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] server process (PID 1188) exited with exit code
Date: 2006-10-25 03:26:07
Message-ID: 453ED94F.8080403@opencloud.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-jdbc
Tom Lane wrote:

>                        NULL,    /* let the backend deduce param type */

I think the JDBC driver will be passing the int4 OID for the param type 
in this case.

Best thing is probably for the OP to run with loglevel=2 and see exactly 
what's being sent, though.

-O

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-10-25 03:34:03
Subject: Re: Incorrect behavior with CE and ORDER BY
Previous:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2006-10-25 03:08:53
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition

pgsql-jdbc by date

Next:From: JEAN-PIERRE PELLETIERDate: 2006-10-25 12:53:09
Subject: Re: [JDBC] server process (PID 1188) exited with exit code
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-10-25 02:42:17
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] server process (PID 1188) exited with exit code -1073741819, 8.2 beta1

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group