From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | Joshua Reich <josh(at)root(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: /contrib/cube improvements: |
Date: | 2006-07-27 19:46:28 |
Message-ID: | 44C91814.70802@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
I wrote:
>
> I have applied this and made an attempt to fix
> cube/expected/cube_1.out - we will still need to keep an eye on the
> various cube tests.
>
It looks like with the current tests we will need at least one more
possible results file (gazelle and asp on buildfarm agree about negative
zero but disagree about ordering, so we would need to handle both
variants which were previously handed in just cube_1.out). That would
make four for this little module. Is it just me or does that seem
excessive? Can we possibly simplify things a bit?
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-07-27 19:52:07 | pgsql: Aggregate functions now support multiple input arguments. |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-07-27 18:38:55 | pgsql: another try at keeping AIX/ppc happy on cube test. |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rocco Altier | 2006-07-27 19:48:20 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: another try at keeping AIX/ppc happy on cube test. |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2006-07-27 17:46:01 | Re: Hash indexes (was: On-disk bitmap index patch) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-07-27 19:54:09 | Re: patch implementing the multi-argument aggregates (SOC project) |
Previous Message | Marc Munro | 2006-07-27 16:16:58 | Re: New shared memory hooks proposal (was Re: |