Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?
Date: 2005-12-02 18:47:18
Message-ID: 4469.1133549238@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patchespgsql-ports
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>   --with-libedit-preferred  prefer libedit over readline
>   --without-readline      do not use Readline

Possibly
    --without-readline      do not use readline or libedit

In any case please be consistent about the capitalization ...

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-ports by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-12-02 18:52:07
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-12-02 18:39:00
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-12-02 18:52:07
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-12-02 18:42:40
Subject: Re: Numeric 508 datatype

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-12-02 18:52:07
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-12-02 18:42:40
Subject: Re: Numeric 508 datatype

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group