Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases (

From: Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>
To: Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>
Cc: Luke Lonergan <llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org, stange(at)rentec(dot)com, gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu, pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com, icub3d(at)gmail(dot)com
Subject: Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases (
Date: 2005-11-20 08:55:59
Message-ID: 43803A1F.9030708@paradise.net.nz (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
Mark Kirkwood wrote:

> 
> - I am happy that seqscan is cpu bound after ~110M/s (It's cpu bound on 
> my old P3 system even earlier than that....)

Ahem - after reading Alan's postings I am not so sure, ISTM that there 
is some more investigation required here too :-).



In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: William YuDate: 2005-11-20 12:55:14
Subject: Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases (
Previous:From: Alan StangeDate: 2005-11-20 04:43:28
Subject: Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases (

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group