Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases (

From: Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>
To: Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>
Cc: Luke Lonergan <llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org, stange(at)rentec(dot)com, gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu, pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com, icub3d(at)gmail(dot)com
Subject: Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases (
Date: 2005-11-20 08:55:59
Message-ID: 43803A1F.9030708@paradise.net.nz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Mark Kirkwood wrote:

>
> - I am happy that seqscan is cpu bound after ~110M/s (It's cpu bound on
> my old P3 system even earlier than that....)

Ahem - after reading Alan's postings I am not so sure, ISTM that there
is some more investigation required here too :-).

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message William Yu 2005-11-20 12:55:14 Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases (
Previous Message Alan Stange 2005-11-20 04:43:28 Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases (