Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: State of support for back PG branches

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Steve Atkins <steve(at)blighty(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: State of support for back PG branches
Date: 2005-09-27 16:26:49
Message-ID: 433972C9.3070301@agliodbs.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Steve,

> The only crystal ball involved is the assumption that if bizgres has
> Neat Stuff(tm) that would be of widespread use in it's development
> tree at that point then the odds are good that it, or something
> functionally equivalent to it, will appear in the 8.2 development
> tree. 

It certainly won't be because it hasn't been submitted.  All features 
for Bizgres PostgreSQL (as opposed to the proprietary MPP) will be sent 
to -patches.   The main difference will be the release schedule.

--Josh

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-09-27 16:32:14
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] \x output blowing up
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2005-09-27 16:16:07
Subject: Re: Making pgxs builds work with a relocated installation

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group