Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: EnterpriseDB ?

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: "Goulet, Dick" <DGoulet(at)vicr(dot)com>
Cc: Izoel Aguiar C <iaguiar(at)tpitic(dot)com(dot)mx>,pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: EnterpriseDB ?
Date: 2005-08-23 18:04:58
Message-ID: 430B654A.2080504@commandprompt.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin
Goulet, Dick wrote:

>>From what I've seen in their beta version, yes their just being a Red
>Hat like var and adding some gui based add-ons. 
>  
>
Well that isn't true at all. They have added a huge Oracle compatibility 
layer.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake


>-----Original Message-----
>From: pgsql-admin-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
>[mailto:pgsql-admin-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Izoel Aguiar C
>Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2005 12:43 PM
>To: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
>Subject: [ADMIN] EnterpriseDB ?
>
>I just saw the  interview  made in LinuxWorld with Enterprisedb,   my 
>question is:  are they really supporting PostgreSQL like they claim?
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
>       choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
>       match
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
>  
>


In response to

pgsql-admin by date

Next:From: Jim C. NasbyDate: 2005-08-23 18:34:36
Subject: Re: sleep?
Previous:From: jose fuenmayorDate: 2005-08-23 18:01:46
Subject: Fwd: Indexes (Disk space)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group