Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?
Date: 2005-12-02 18:32:42
Message-ID: 4306.1133548362@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patchespgsql-ports
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> The basic problem is that with two deterministic flags the default
> values for those flags are unclear.

That's a really good point ... the only explainable default would be
that both are --without, which is a crummy default.

I think the way that Bruce's patch works is fine, only the name of the
switch needs tweaking ;-)

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-ports by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-12-02 18:38:10
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?
Previous:From: Seneca CunninghamDate: 2005-12-02 18:29:38
Subject: Re: AIX Permission weirdness

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-12-02 18:38:10
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-12-02 18:23:35
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-12-02 18:38:10
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-12-02 18:23:35
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group