From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? |
Date: | 2005-12-02 18:32:42 |
Message-ID: | 4306.1133548362@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches pgsql-ports |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> The basic problem is that with two deterministic flags the default
> values for those flags are unclear.
That's a really good point ... the only explainable default would be
that both are --without, which is a crummy default.
I think the way that Bruce's patch works is fine, only the name of the
switch needs tweaking ;-)
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-12-02 18:38:10 | Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-12-02 18:23:35 | Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-12-02 18:38:10 | Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-12-02 18:23:35 | Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-12-02 18:38:10 | Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? |
Previous Message | Seneca Cunningham | 2005-12-02 18:29:38 | Re: AIX Permission weirdness |