From: | Jesper Thorhauge <jth(at)conzentrate(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: getBinaryStream and OutOfMemoryException |
Date: | 2005-06-28 13:38:55 |
Message-ID: | 42C152EF.305@conzentrate.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Okay, thats seems like a lot!! What are the priorities about getting
this modification into the driver? I have seen some other posts
regarding this binaryStream / memory problem, so it seems that i'm not
the only one :-)
Oliver Jowett wrote:
>Jesper Thorhauge wrote:
>
>
>>Okay, thanks alot for the quick answer! I was wondering, do you know how
>>much more efficient it could be done using the binary format you are
>>mentioning? I'm especially interested in decreasing the amount of memory
>>used to get large bytea values...
>>
>>
>
>Um, rough estimate would be about a factor of 5 (assume text
>representation of bytea averages about ~2.5 characters per raw byte, and
>characters are 16 bits on the Java side)
>
>-O
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kevin Murphy | 2005-06-28 18:55:25 | OT: easiest way to create a custom PreparedStatement class |
Previous Message | Oliver Jowett | 2005-06-28 13:29:45 | Re: getBinaryStream and OutOfMemoryException |