Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Postgres in government

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgres in government
Date: 2005-05-19 19:59:16
Message-ID: 428CF014.9080002@commandprompt.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacypgsql-general
Ron Mayer wrote:
> Josh Berkus wrote:
> 
>> Three large Federal agencies I'm not allowed to mention :-(
> 
> 
> I'm curious why they can't be mentioned?  A NDA regarding the
> technologies used?  Classified projects?

I would guess because the people above them don't know their using 
PostgreSQL ;)

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake



-- 
Your PostgreSQL solutions company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Programming, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/

In response to

Responses

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Mark HarrisonDate: 2005-05-19 20:10:45
Subject: Re: Postgres in government
Previous:From: Ron MayerDate: 2005-05-19 19:46:47
Subject: Re: Postgres in government

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Mark HarrisonDate: 2005-05-19 20:10:45
Subject: Re: Postgres in government
Previous:From: Ron MayerDate: 2005-05-19 19:46:47
Subject: Re: Postgres in government

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group