Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pgfoundry moved ...

From: "Gavin M(dot) Roy" <gmr(at)ehpg(dot)net>
To: Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>,"Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgfoundry moved ...
Date: 2005-04-28 17:24:49
Message-ID: 42711C61.9010104@ehpg.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www
Hmm, that is interesting.  I have no experience in troubleshooting 
jails, but that server was a pgsql db server (on Gentoo Linux) prior to 
being borg, and has been very quick under heavy loads without any I/O 
issues.

Gavin

Magnus Hagander wrote:

>>If there are performance issues on www.postgresql.org it 
>>seems silly not to use borg.  The machine is way under 
>>utilized and you have more than enough donated bandwidth to 
>>play with there.
>>    
>>
>
>The only performance issues related to the base www site right now I
>think is the fact that I/O is horribly slow in the jail for svr2 (which
>runs wwwmaster) and that one is already on borg IIRC. The mirror script
>runs a *lot* faster on a heavily loaded linux server that I've tested it
>on. Not sure if it's the I/O bw on borg that's over the edge, or if it's
>the jails themselves causing it. I know Dave talked about comparing I/O
>on the main host vs the jails, not sure if he ever got through to doing
>it.
>
>
>//Magnus
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
>      joining column's datatypes do not match
>  
>


In response to

Responses

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Marc G. FournierDate: 2005-04-28 17:26:25
Subject: Re: pgfoundry moved ...
Previous:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2005-04-28 17:13:17
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Need help on drivers, add-ons

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group