Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Psql_General (E-mail)" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?
Date: 2005-04-04 16:30:50
Message-ID: 42516BBA.2080903@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:

>Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>
>
>>... If there are no license or build issues I'm in favor.
>>
>>
>
>Peter has pointed out that the problem of circular dependencies is a
>showstopper for integrating plPHP. The build order has to be
> Postgres
> PHP (since its existing DB support requires Postgres to build)
> plPHP
>so putting #1 and #3 into the same package is a no go. Which is too
>bad, but I see no good way around it.
>
>
>
>

Oh. I didn't see that - I assumed that it had been fixed. (My email has
been AWOL for 48 hours).

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2005-04-04 16:37:09 Re: Raise Exception
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-04-04 16:01:41 Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2005-04-04 16:37:09 Re: Raise Exception
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2005-04-04 16:18:06 Re: Bug in DROP NOT NULL