Tom Lane said:

>
> We hashed all this out in the pghackers list back in August, but I
> agree there ought to be something about it on the website.
>

The reason I asked again is that, notwithstanding the recent discussion, I
have observed confusion about the matter (including Jan telling me he didn't
think there was any agreed policy).

cheers

andrew

In response to

• Re: Upcoming PG re-releases at 2005-11-30 16:40:30 from Tom Lane

pgsql-www by date

Next:	From: Marc G. Fournier	Date: 2005-12-01 03:56:33
	Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Upcoming PG re-releases
Previous:	From: David Fetter	Date: 2005-12-01 01:36:52
	Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Upcoming PG re-releases

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Marc G. Fournier	Date: 2005-12-01 03:56:33
	Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Upcoming PG re-releases
Previous:	From: Christopher Kings-Lynne	Date: 2005-12-01 01:41:52
	Subject: Problem with COPY CSV