Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: is pg_autovacuum so effective ?

From: Markus Schaber <schabios(at)logi-track(dot)com>
To: "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: is pg_autovacuum so effective ?
Date: 2005-02-28 15:46:34
Message-ID: 42233CDA.3030407@logi-track.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
Hi, Matthew,

Matthew T. O'Connor schrieb:

> The version of pg_autovacuum that I submitted for 8.0 could be
> instructed "per table" but it didn't make the cut.  Aside from moved out
> of contrib and integrated into the backend, per table autovacuum
> settings is probably the next highest priority.

What was the reason for non-acceptance?

Is it available as a standalone project?


Markus
-- 
markus schaber | dipl. informatiker
logi-track ag | rennweg 14-16 | ch 8001 z├╝rich
phone +41-43-888 62 52 | fax +41-43-888 62 53
mailto:schabios(at)logi-track(dot)com | www.logi-track.com

In response to

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Bruno Wolff IIIDate: 2005-02-28 18:38:18
Subject: Re: is pg_autovacuum so effective ?
Previous:From: Matthew T. O'ConnorDate: 2005-02-28 14:30:58
Subject: Re: is pg_autovacuum so effective ?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group