Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [BUGS] More SSL questions..

From: "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>,Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>,Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>,pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [BUGS] More SSL questions..
Date: 2005-01-06 15:52:25
Message-ID: 41DD5EB9.3030207@zeut.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers-win32
Tom Lane wrote:

>Whether we're overestimating it or not, we have to make a decision and
>we have to make it now.  This thread is singlehandedly delaying the 8.0
>release.  Since I haven't seen any serious alternative proposed, I think
>we have to go with the CSIDL_APPDATA reference point.
>
>Given that decision it seems like the best names are
>
>	APPDATA/postgresql/pgpass.txt
>	APPDATA/postgresql/psqlrc.txt
>	APPDATA/postgresql/psql_history
>	APPDATA/postgresql/postgresql.crt
>	APPDATA/postgresql/postgresql.key
>	APPDATA/postgresql/root.crt
>
>Objections?
>

None.  Looks good to me. 

BTW, I agree with Magnus's argument that we are overestimating the cost 
of it being hidden.


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-01-06 16:19:14
Subject: Re: File names for client interfaces
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2005-01-06 15:48:16
Subject: Re: [BUGS] More SSL questions..

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group