Tom Lane wrote:
>Whether we're overestimating it or not, we have to make a decision and
>we have to make it now. This thread is singlehandedly delaying the 8.0
>release. Since I haven't seen any serious alternative proposed, I think
>we have to go with the CSIDL_APPDATA reference point.
>Given that decision it seems like the best names are
None. Looks good to me.
BTW, I agree with Magnus's argument that we are overestimating the cost
of it being hidden.
In response to
pgsql-hackers-win32 by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2005-01-06 16:19:14|
|Subject: Re: File names for client interfaces|
|Previous:||From: Andrew Dunstan||Date: 2005-01-06 15:48:16|
|Subject: Re: [BUGS] More SSL questions..|