From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>, Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [BUGS] More SSL questions.. |
Date: | 2005-01-05 23:35:53 |
Message-ID: | 41DC79D9.20508@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers-win32 |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
>>>>If we want to "play nice" in the windows world, we should definitly
>>>>*not* put things directly in %USERPROFILE%. And if we're ever going to
>>>>change it, now is the time. I would like to see all these files moved
>>>>into <appdatadir>\PostgreSQL\
>>>>or %USERPROFILE%\PostgreSQL\ (Appdata is obviously the nicest). We
>>>>might want to consider removing the leading-dot on those files too -
>>>>some Widnows tools go nuts on that. (most don't, but some do). And it
>>>>doesn't accomplish anything (like it does on Unix) other than confusing
>>>>the user. If it's not too much work.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>The problem with Appdata is that it's a hidden folder. Are we storing
>>>files here that we expect the user to be able to get to easitly and
>>>edit often? It may still be the best option, but I thought I would
>>>rasise that point. The other option is to put most of this data into
>>>the registrty.
>>>
>>>BTW I have a few folders like %USERPROVILE%\.Application from windows
>>>ports of Unix apps like the GIMP.
>>>
>>>
>>It's not hidden on my XP-Pro box.
>>
>>
>
>OK, I can't believe I know the answer to this, but if you display your
>%USERPROFILE directory using the standard XP directory viewer, and under
>Tools/Folder_Options, choose "View" then look at the "Hidden Files and
>Folders" option. I bet you will see "Show hidden files and folders"
>enabled, but by default that radio button is disabled.
>
>So, buy default "Application Data" is invisible in that application,
>though you have enabled it, probably because you know what you are doing
>and need to get to certain configuration files.
>
>
Bzzzt. The hidden attribute is not set on the directory. Has nothing to
do with my explorer settings. When I turn that setting off I can still
see the folder.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-01-05 23:39:35 | Re: [BUGS] More SSL questions.. |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2005-01-05 23:35:44 | Re: [BUGS] More SSL questions.. |