Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Bug in JDBC-Driver?

From: Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>, Antje(dot)Stejskal(at)ppi(dot)de,pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Bug in JDBC-Driver?
Date: 2004-11-30 23:17:42
Message-ID: 41ACFF96.6090501@fastcrypt.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc
Well, I'm not going to defend the spec, as it's broken in a few places.

However there is no setTimestamp without timezone.

Dave

Tom Lane wrote:

>Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> writes:
>  
>
>>Kris Jurka wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>On Tue, 30 Nov 2004, Dave Cramer wrote:
>>>      
>>>
>>>>Since timestamp without timezone is a postgresql extension
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>This is not true.
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>Well, one of them must be an extension so it is timestampz ?
>>    
>>
>
>timestamp with and without timezone are both required by the SQL
>standard.  If JDBC only supports one of them I'd think the JDBC
>spec is a tad broken.
>
>			regards, tom lane
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
>
>
>  
>

-- 
Dave Cramer
http://www.postgresintl.com
519 939 0336
ICQ#14675561


In response to

Responses

pgsql-jdbc by date

Next:From: Oliver JowettDate: 2004-12-01 00:11:49
Subject: Re: Bug in JDBC-Driver?
Previous:From: Éric ParéDate: 2004-11-30 18:06:09
Subject: Re: Need a performance tip - Statement pooling for server

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group