Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PostgreSQL in the press again

From: Thomas Hallgren <thhal(at)mailblocks(dot)com>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL in the press again
Date: 2004-11-09 20:13:00
Message-ID: 419124CC.7020209@mailblocks.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> 
> ... does that help?
> 
Ok, so to abbreviate what you and Josh writes into what I had in mind 
(??? denotes my own lack of further knowledge):

Master + read-only slaves:
  - Slony-I when all sites are trusted
  - dbMirror for untrusted slaves and/or table based master slave assignment
  - Mammoth Replicator, proprietary ???
  - erServer ???

Multi-master:
  - C-JDBC, Will be transaction safe once PostgreSQL has XA
  - pgPool, not transaction safe ???
(- future, the stuff Jan is working on and Postgres-R)

Perhaps some info about which solutions that are PostgreSQL specific and 
which are database agnostic should be added.

Regards,
Thomas Hallgren


In response to

Responses

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Andrew SullivanDate: 2004-11-09 20:23:10
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL in the press again
Previous:From: Marc G. FournierDate: 2004-11-09 20:11:48
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL in the press again

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group