Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PostgreSQL in the press again

From: Thomas Hallgren <thhal(at)mailblocks(dot)com>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL in the press again
Date: 2004-11-09 18:54:14
Message-ID: 41911256.8090702@mailblocks.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
Andrew,
> ... That's because there are different needs, and one has
> to have systems which support those needs.  I doubt that a single
> system would really be able to accommodate every scenario.
> 
I've seen this argument several times and it always prevents Slony and 
other replication solutions from being mentioned. My suggestion is that 
the scenarios are outlined (there can't be that many, 2-4 perhaps?) 
together with the corresponding preferred solution.

Regards,
Thomas Hallgren


In response to

Responses

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Marc G. FournierDate: 2004-11-09 19:00:19
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL in the press again
Previous:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2004-11-09 18:17:33
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL in the press again

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group