Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal

From: Alexey Borzov <borz_off(at)cs(dot)msu(dot)su>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Mitch Pirtle <mitch(dot)pirtle(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal
Date: 2004-10-28 17:37:05
Message-ID: 41812E41.3000003@cs.msu.su
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www

Hi,

Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>> threads I'm not sure how to help, or if it is really welcome. Who is
>>> in charge, what is the plan, and how can I (realistically) help?
>>
>> You are currently not offering help. You are cheerleading for your
>> particular CMS. Reality check: will you still be ready to help if we
>> don't standartize on your particular Nuke clone? Are you actually
>> aware of the website requirements?
>
>
> Alexey your being rude and innacurate.

Definitely. Just like Mitch was in his mail.

> Mitch is currently offering to
> help. He just doesn't seem to agree with your approach.
> BTW Mambo is not a Nuke clone. That would be like saying Bricolage is a
> Nuke clone.

BTW looking at Mambo's site it has only MySQL in its requirements. Will we at
last honestly say that PostgreSQL in unsuitable for web and install the most
popular open source database to run postgresql.org?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2004-10-28 17:48:23 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal
Previous Message Mitch Pirtle 2004-10-28 17:26:08 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2004-10-28 17:48:23 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal
Previous Message Mitch Pirtle 2004-10-28 17:26:08 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal