Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Performance on Win32 vs Cygwin

From: Reini Urban <rurban(at)x-ray(dot)at>
To: pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Performance on Win32 vs Cygwin
Date: 2004-10-14 19:40:59
Message-ID: 416ED64B.3070000@x-ray.at (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers-win32pgsql-performance
Magnus Hagander schrieb:
> IIRC, previous versions of postgresql (< 8.0) did not correctly sync
> disks when running on Cygwin. I'm not 100% sure, can someone confirm?
> 8.0 does, and I beleive it does both under native win32 and cygwin.

yes, sync is a NOOP on cygwin.

> It's been my experience that the native version is slightly faster than
> the cygwin one, but I've only compared 8.0 to 8.0.

Sure. This is expected. Cygwin's interim's layer costs a lot of time. 
(process handling, path resolution)
-- 
Reini Urban
http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/home/rurban/

In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Dave CramerDate: 2004-10-14 19:59:14
Subject: Re: Excessive context switching on SMP Xeons
Previous:From: Aaron WermanDate: 2004-10-14 19:27:51
Subject: Re: Performance vs Schemas

pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

Next:From: Dave PageDate: 2004-10-14 19:50:13
Subject: Re: Is there going to be an installer for V8 Beta 3?
Previous:From: Tim PenheyDate: 2004-10-14 19:05:38
Subject: Is there going to be an installer for V8 Beta 3?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group