Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

output file name - was pg_restore / psql -f massive problems with

From: Harald Armin Massa <ghum(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: output file name - was pg_restore / psql -f massive problems with
Date: 2004-10-03 18:27:17
Message-ID: 41604485.10400@gmx.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers-win32
Andrey,

thank you very much! Both informations are correct.

It is indeed possible to restore with using the -F c option on pg_dump, 
and I replaces psql.exe with the one from beta3, and everything worked 
correct.

So it is positive that this information is now on the newer dates in the 
psql-mailinglists to google it up - I threw my hopes away after reading 
"pg_restore is known not to work" within win32-hackers .)))

###########################################################

Usage:
  pg_restore [OPTION]... [FILE]

General options:
  -d, --dbname=NAME        output database name
  -f, --file=FILENAME      output file name

I struggled some syntax-times with "output file name". What is a "output 
file" supposed to be in connection with "pg_Restore"?

Harald



Attachment: ghum.vcf
Description: text/x-vcard (366 bytes)

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

Next:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2004-10-03 21:39:21
Subject: Re: output file name - was pg_restore / psql
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2004-10-03 13:29:52
Subject: Re: pg_restore / psql -f massive problems with

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group