output file name - was pg_restore / psql -f massive problems with

From: Harald Armin Massa <ghum(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: output file name - was pg_restore / psql -f massive problems with
Date: 2004-10-03 18:27:17
Message-ID: 41604485.10400@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers-win32

Andrey,

thank you very much! Both informations are correct.

It is indeed possible to restore with using the -F c option on pg_dump,
and I replaces psql.exe with the one from beta3, and everything worked
correct.

So it is positive that this information is now on the newer dates in the
psql-mailinglists to google it up - I threw my hopes away after reading
"pg_restore is known not to work" within win32-hackers .)))

###########################################################

Usage:
pg_restore [OPTION]... [FILE]

General options:
-d, --dbname=NAME output database name
-f, --file=FILENAME output file name

I struggled some syntax-times with "output file name". What is a "output
file" supposed to be in connection with "pg_Restore"?

Harald

Attachment Content-Type Size
ghum.vcf text/x-vcard 366 bytes

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2004-10-03 21:39:21 Re: output file name - was pg_restore / psql
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2004-10-03 13:29:52 Re: pg_restore / psql -f massive problems with