Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
> If there is that much clamor for this, why not make a new schema,
> such as "pginformation_schema" People could then tweak the views
> to their heart's content, while keeping 100% compliance.
Doesn't sound very neat.
If we add a pginformation_schema, then it'd probably contain all of the
existing information_schema... plus more. Reduplication?
I guess we could just leverage off the existing information_schema views:
CREATE VIEW pg_information_schmema.some_view AS SELECT * FROM
information_schema.some_view (then add extra bits).
But it still doesn't sound very neat.
Regards and best wishes,
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Mike Rylander||Date: 2004-07-02 02:55:26|
|Subject: Re: Quick question regarding tablespaces|
|Previous:||From: Justin Clift||Date: 2004-07-02 02:34:28|
|Subject: Re: Bug with view definitions?|