On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 4:48 AM, Craig
> Interestingly, though, the test program does appear to be leaking - at
> least, the peak working set slowly climbs. It's all private working set. Not
> sure why yet since the memory use looks like it _should_ be constant.
How does the return value of str() get cleaned up here?
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2009-08-23 05:42:36|
|Subject: Re: Slaying the HYPOTamus |
|Previous:||From: Greg Stark||Date: 2009-08-23 04:39:52|
|Subject: Re: Slaying the HYPOTamus|
pgsql-bugs by date
|Next:||From: Radoslaw Zielinski||Date: 2009-08-23 08:00:25|
|Subject: Re: 8.4.0 data loss / HOT-related bug|
|Previous:||From: Craig Ringer||Date: 2009-08-23 03:58:01|
|Subject: Re: BUG #4996: postgres.exe memory consumption keeps going