Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>>>So can I quietly beg the Win32 group to expedite this port. I believe
>>>>you will be utterly astonished at the demand. Please.....
>>Speaking of win32 port, do/will we need a win32 users list
>>(pgsql-win32)? MySQL has one. For now, I think such a list can assert to
>>the world that a native port exist (or will, very soon), plus as a help
>>forum for users who want to try building one (as the docs on building
>>the win32 port is nonexistant right now).
> Seems we use win32-devel until we release 7.5, and after that, we could
> use a separate list, or use the existing ports list.
I for one vote for win32 users having their own list as soon as
possible. I predict three things:
1) there will be *lots* of them coming to -general (instead of to -novice);
2) there will be a surge of novice-oriented and MySQL-related posts in
3) the other members of the -general list will get annoyed enough that
eventually a win32-users list is set up.
So why go through the pain of #1 and #2 when we can go directly to #3 :-)
Btw, here's a nice read as well as a reminder of things to come:
In response to
pgsql-general by date
|Next:||From: Sean Chittenden||Date: 2004-03-28 13:28:50|
|Subject: Resolution for "ERROR: cannot handle whole-row reference" ?|
|Previous:||From: Frank Finner||Date: 2004-03-28 07:14:50|
|Subject: Re: Running multiple databases PG vs MySQL|