Re: pg_ctl

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers-win32 <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_ctl
Date: 2004-03-24 15:54:02
Message-ID: 4061AF1A.9090907@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers-win32

Back on December 1st I wrote:

>
>
> I suspect this work is actually a bit premature, and would best be
> done after we have a working Win32 postmaster. After all, you can
> happily run postgres without ever calling pg_ctl - it's a convenience
> rather than an absolute necessity (unlike initdb). On Windows,
> production users probably wouldn't use it at all - they would use the
> service manager, I should think.
>
>

Are we now in a state where it would make sense to look at doing pg_ctl
in C?

(And has anyone looked at putting in service manager hooks?)

cheers

andrew

In response to

  • pg_ctl at 2003-12-01 17:47:29 from Andrew Dunstan

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-03-24 16:15:08 Re: pg_ctl
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-03-24 03:48:18 Re: default psql to localhost on platforms without unix domain