Re: [pgsql-www] Collaboration Tool Proposal

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Collaboration Tool Proposal
Date: 2004-02-27 19:12:31
Message-ID: 403F969F.70005@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32 pgsql-www

Greg Stark wrote:

>
>I also dislike BZ for aesthetic reasons. If one person is editing a ticket
>while another person updates the same ticket, it refuses your edits and you
>have to start all over. I think all the updates are stored in one big field.
>
>

AFAICS it's one row per comment, at least in the 2.17 code base. BZ does
have horrible locking issues - they are being dealt with as part of the
bugs I referred to elsewhere.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2004-02-27 23:31:14 Re: [pgsql-www] Collaboration Tool Proposal
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2004-02-27 18:48:57 Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message tswan 2004-02-27 19:34:41 Re: Tablespaces
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2004-02-27 19:05:02 Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal

Browse pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2004-02-27 23:31:14 Re: [pgsql-www] Collaboration Tool Proposal
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2004-02-27 18:48:57 Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Treat 2004-02-27 19:41:22 Re: Short notice, but ...
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2004-02-27 19:05:02 Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal